https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11758
Peter Alexander <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] | |m --- Comment #1 from Peter Alexander <[email protected]> 2014-02-23 09:41:44 PST --- I think 3 is the correct solution. You are right in saying that it disallows legitimate use cases such as "uniform(-2, 5u)", but currently these don't work, so we don't break any code. You are also right in saying that it incurs a small performance hit but (a) it is negligible compared to the generation of a random number, and (b) the user can easily fix it by not using mixed signed/unsigned. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
