https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12261
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara <[email protected]> 2014-02-26 00:33:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #3) > Introduced in https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3210. > > Looking at that pull's testcases, this might be an intentional change - (T) is > more specialized than (alias T), as all types can be aliases but not all > aliases are types. Yes, the current behavior has practical benefit that: template isAliasable(alias T) { pragma(msg, T); } template isAliasable(T) { pragma(msg, T); } struct A1(T) {} struct A2{} alias a1 = isAliasable!(const A1!double); alias a2 = isAliasable!(const A2); With 2.065: A1!double A2 --> type qualifier information has lost With 2.066a: const(A1!double) const(A2) --> accessible to the full information -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
