https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11946
--- Comment #32 from Vladimir Panteleev <[email protected]> 2014-03-03 18:12:41 EET --- (In reply to comment #31) > It does not really matter. What is the point of adding more features is they > break basic guarantees? It does not fit nicely with idea that templates are > not > affected by instantiation scope and forces you to pollute your code with loads > of boilerplate just to be sure. I certainly won't complain if this change is reverted and replaced with a suitable alternative, even if it means I'll have to rewrite all the code that depends on it. > It should be other way around, "dynamic alias" for those who do want a context > pointer. "Don't pay for what you don't use" and principle of least surprise. Fair enough, though we don't have a "dynamic" keyword we can abuse here... -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
