https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12313
Vladimir Panteleev <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Panteleev <[email protected]> 2014-03-07 17:54:23 EET --- (In reply to comment #2) > It does not also make any sense from language semantics point of view as > a.tupleof is effectively tuple of variable aliases. And there is no such thing > as `ref alias`. > > Sounds more like a hack to fix another hack. I see it more like the foreach body being like a function (whose body is implicitly inlined). In this context, "ref" works out fine. Since .tupleof only enumerates fields, and not functions, each member can be mapped to a concrete value (and thus can work with "ref"). -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
