https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7044
--- Comment #31 from yebblies <[email protected]> 2014-03-08 16:04:38 EST --- (In reply to comment #29) > > This is not actually the best option, Yes, just a workaround for you until we get a real fix. > because the runtime is statically > compiled so we'd have to include the whole dependencies in the .a, and we lose > dynamic linking, which mean we don't get security updates from the > distribution > anymore unless we recompile our stuff with a new version. > This is not true. You still get dynamic linking. The dmd-produced command line is something like this: g++ prog.obj -lstuffprogneeds -lphobos2 But you want g++ prog.obj -lstuffprogneeds -lphobos2 -lstuffphobosneeds A little bit of 'ar' magic will produce a new static lib that contains everything in libphobos2.a and everything in libstuffphobosneeds.a You can this pass this to dmd via -debuglib/-defaultlib and get (almost) the same thing as the above command line. > I think at least we reach an agreement for the solution to adopt, right? If > that the case I might give it another shot to the implementation. But I don't > want to come up with another PR that gets rejected. Sure. I was just giving a workaround that doesn't require changing the compiler. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
