https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4699
--- Comment #3 from Stewart Gordon <[email protected]> 2014-03-29 12:21:31 PDT --- Because the two functions named f0 are in disjoint scopes, the compiler shouldn't care about the fact that they have the same name. I can see a problem in that at the moment the mangled names of the two functions would clash. So this is presumably a temporary restriction in the compiler pending a name mangling scheme that avoids this. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
