https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5729
--- Comment #4 from Kenji Hara <[email protected]> 2014-03-28 20:57:12 PDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > &a.bla correctly gets the address of the function. If this were changed for > @properties only, as you seem to suggest, then how would one go about getting > the address of the actual function? It would also lead to different semantics > from the same syntax depending on whether the function were marked @property, > which is highly undesirable (do you want to go check the class definition > every > time you want to get an address?) I agree with this argument. -- Configure issuemail: https://d.puremagic.com/issues/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
