https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8307
--- Comment #4 from Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> --- (In reply to timon.gehr from comment #3) > In 'foo' the types of the two return expressions do not 'match exactly', yet > it is accepted. There's an error with -w though, so it's caught one way or the other. Although maybe we're just lucky here. > In 'bar' according to the spec the return type is settled > after the first return statement, hence there would _not_ be a circular > dependency. Ah, ok then. --
