https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6421
--- Comment #7 from Kenji Hara <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andrej Mitrovic from comment #5) > (In reply to bearophile_hugs from comment #3) > > (In reply to Andrej Mitrovic from comment #2) > > > > > With a parser fix we could implement this in D: > > > float[3] arr = float[3](1.0, 2.0, 3.0); > > > > I also like this syntax (composed of two parts usable in different > > situations): > > > > float[$] arr = [1.0, 2.0, 3.0]s; > > > > Or: > > > > auto arr = [1.0f, 2.0f, 3.0f]s; > > I don't like them, they're too much of a special case. Re-using existing > syntax is better IMO. I also think that "static array literal sytax" (eg. DIP34) is not good feature. But "length inference" on variable declaration is a useful syntax. float[$] arr = [1, 2, 3]; // typeof(arr) == float[3] auto[$] arr = [1.0f, 2.0f, 3.0f]; // dito --
