https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13433
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> --- As I said, I'm not against adding it. It just seems to me that in most cases where you'd be getting the time that quickly, it wouldn't make sense to only have a resolution of 1 ms. And even if it's being filtered, I would think that it would usually be rather ridiculous to be logging stuff hundreds of thousands of times a second and that the number of logging statements should be seriously reduced in such code, so I really think that that's a pretty crazy use case. But I'll add the ability to use the coarse clock instead and let folks shoot themselves in the foot with it if they really want to. Given that it was added to both Linux and FreeBSD's APIs, presumably there are at least some folks who think that it's worth having, even if I think that it's kind of crazy. --
