https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2525
--- Comment #8 from Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> --- Shame on you, Andrej Mitrovic! I totally support this now, perhaps not so much 'override' as wanting a new 'implements' keyword. But the distinction is so pale, and the real benefit is really *knowing* that a method is actually part of a base class / interface API, so I'm now definitely in huge favor of allowing (and perhaps even *requiring*) override for implementing keywords. --
