https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14704
--- Comment #24 from Ketmar Dark <[email protected]> --- (In reply to dennis.m.ritchie from comment #20) > (In reply to Ketmar Dark from comment #19) > > (In reply to dennis.m.ritchie from comment #17) > > > Do you agree that one of the directions D - is to write less code than > > > required C++? > > nope. > > Quote of the documentation: > `The main "chip" of the language can be considered as an abundance of > syntax, intended to reduce the program's source code (templates, mixins, > etc.) and a variety of keywords to test and debug code.` > http://wiki.dlang.org/Reading_the_documentation_%28in_Russian%29#.D0.92.D0. > B2.D0.B5.D0.B4.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5 > > Many people believe that a short code is a distinctive chip D. If you do not > think so, then I have to assume that your quibbles are absolutely groundless. that is not what you asked, and that doesn't means what you think it means. > > (In reply to dennis.m.ritchie from comment #18) > > > `If we have shorthand syntax for full imports, why there is no option for > > > shorthand partial imports? This is expected behavior.` > > > > > > What is not an argument? > > this is not an argument, this is exactly the "i wan't it 'cause i want it". > > In order to make something better, to find bold argument :) "better" has no universal definition, so this is not an argument. > If you like to write 50 lines instead of 10, it does not make you some kind > of guru, and the people who come up with the right design to Go - code > monkeys. import a; import b; import c; three lines. import { a; b; c; } five lines. i think that discussion can be closed now. --
