https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14845
Martin Nowak <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX |--- --- Comment #3 from Martin Nowak <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Walter Bright from comment #1) > The trouble with such overloads is they produce a new instance for every > different array size. This can result in an unnoticed blizzard of bloat. Well than you mark that function as always inline. It only slices that static array and forwards that. > I think this should be marked as "wontfix". Didn't we have a strong commitment to no longer break code? We should add those overloads, but can deprecate them IMO. (In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #2) > And as my humble opinion, I feel a "rangified funciton" accepts *only* > ranges. Exactly rangified, those functions didn't took a ranges before and now they *only* take ranges. --
