[Issue 15009] Object.destroy calls unnecessary postblits for destruction of static arrays object

[via Digitalmars-d-bugs]

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15009

Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Object.destroy doesn't call |Object.destroy calls
                   |dtors for object in static  |unnecessary postblits for
                   |arrays                      |destruction of static
                   |                            |arrays object

--- Comment #2 from Kenji Hara <k.hara...@gmail.com> ---
Note that, destroy actually calls destructors.

import std.stdio, std.conv, core.stdc.stdlib;
struct S {
    int x;
    this(int x) { writeln("ctor"); }
    this(this)  { writeln("ctor(postblit)"); }
    ~this()     { writeln("dtor"); }
}

void main(string[] args) {
    S[2]* arr = cast(S[2]*)calloc(1, S.sizeof);
    printf("-- calloc done\n");
    emplace(arr, S(1));
    printf("-- emplace done\n");
    destroy(*arr);
    printf("-- destroy done\n");
    //typeid(*arr).destroy(&arr);
    free(arr);
    printf("-- free done\n");
}

output is:

$ dmd -run test
-- calloc done
ctor
ctor(postblit)
ctor(postblit)
dtor
-- emplace done
ctor(postblit)
dtor
ctor(postblit)
dtor
-- destroy done
-- free done

My point is , the two postblit calls invoked by destroy() is unnecessary.

--