https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15106
--- Comment #8 from David Nadlinger <c...@klickverbot.at> --- (In reply to Manu from comment #7) > Why is 2015 preferable? Because of the improved C99 support (e.g. for string formatting functions). > Do you think it would be appropriate for LDC to have such an installer which > configured ldc2.conf similarly? If LDC has formal installation, it may make > it easier for VisualD to detect installation and auto-configure LDC to work > in Visual Studio? It would definitely be great to have an LDC installer for Windows (distro packages/archives are fine for the other platforms). I don't think anybody is working on this right now; any help would be very much appreciated. --