https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481
--- Comment #32 from Shriramana Sharma <[email protected]> --- (In reply to hsteoh from comment #30) > Huh, I thought this PR was reverted because Andrei/Walter didn't like it; > why is it being pulled into the 2.067 branch? What is not to like about it? Walter only said in comment #7 that he thought it was low priority. What is unacceptable about the PR or even of the concept itself? DRY is a very sane principle and other users have clearly shown use cases where it will help to avoid errors. --
