https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15246
--- Comment #3 from Andrei Alexandrescu <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marco Leise from comment #1) > You are assuming that destructors are inherited and there is an implicit > super-call, but they are actually chained and called one after another from > outer to inner. Under the current language semantics this bug report is > invalid. I agree I am using terminology loosely; newly introduced destructors don't only override the existing ones, they also call them. But I don't see how that makes the bug report invalid. --
