https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5838
Infiltrator <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Infiltrator <[email protected]> --- If we were to do this, then the same should be done for join and joiner too. So that we end up with join => ejoin[0], split => esplit[0], and joiner => join and splitter => split. The problem with this is of course that it would break existing code, so I highly doubt that it would happen. I'm CCing Andrei and Walter on this so that they can make a definitive decision one way or the other. [0] e for eager. You said "a for aeger" before; but I think that was just a spelling error? --
