https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15464
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Kozak <kozz...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Kenji Hara from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrei Alexandrescu from comment #0)
> > Per Timon Gehr's reply, implementation could achieved the feature by means
> > of a lowering.
>
> A function template declaration:
>
> void foo(T)() @attr(T.field) {}
>
> Is now lowered to:
>
> @attr(T.field) template foo(T) { void foo() {} }
>
> So, as Timon said, if we change the lowered form as follows, it will support
> the enhancement naturally.
>
> template foo(T) { void foo() @attr(T.field) {} }
>
>
> However, I have some questions about the corner cases in the change.
> ...
> ----
My current PR affects only postfix udas, so
@uda(T.field) void f(T)(){} still does not compile and will have same behaviour
as before.
So only postfix UDAs change and break, this can be maybe avoid if this new
lowering will be applied only to UDAs with templates parametrs.
The biggest problem I see here is consistency
--
