https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15722
--- Comment #2 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Cédric Picard from comment #1) > I would rather have a comment in the doc saying "Pairwise summation is > slower than naive one, for performance use reduce!((a, b) => a+b)", adding a > new function for that seems overkill. Why? There seems to be a strong resistance to convenience functions in the library, one that is unnecessary. There is a significant difference between arr.sum and arr.reduce!((a, b) => a + b) in usability. In writing this post I initially forgot I have do put a, b in an additional set of brackets, it's complicated and not particularly user-friendly. --
