https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15847
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #2 from [email protected] --- 'Using void initialization doesn't mean "please turn the first assignment into a construction".' No, we definitely don't want that. My point is that it is never valid to have opAssign called on a void initialized object that has a custom opAssign. It works for simple value types, but anything with a custom opAssign cannot allow it. Maybe void initialization should be disabled for types with custom opAssign. --
