https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13348
--- Comment #12 from Steven Schveighoffer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Dmitry Olshansky from comment #11) > > At this point, if we were to fix purity, I think this is the way to go. > > From your comments in the code, you said that most of the time allocations > > will not happen. I'm sure this varies with the language being processed, > > but it's probably mostly true. > > Problem is there is @nogc crowd and then there is pure @safe crowd. I can't > satisfy both. Haha! good point. Until we have allocator being configurable, we can't solve both. I say leave it the way it is until we have that. @nogc is currently way more important than purity I think, and breaking existing @nogc code by making the default all of a sudden use gc, would be disruptive. --
