--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Panteleev <> ---
Oops, meant to paste link to PR.

(In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #1)
> I wonder if we could provide protected non-const and public const overloads.

No because then you get "class Y use of is hidden by Y; use 'alias fun
=;' to introduce base class overload set" errors.


Reply via email to