Martin Nowak <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #6 from Martin Nowak <> ---
I think we still have a few weird orderings for the new function vs. template
overloads, and also within the existing template overloads.
Part of those are simply caused by the way the current ordering is implemented.

Discussing this is quite tricky and doesn't make sense for single examples.

If someone would want to spend the effort on a DIP to come up w/ a sound and
simpler partial ordering, that is implementable in a backward compatible way,
it would probably be a welcome effort.

Don't think it's an urgent topic though.


Reply via email to