https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16654
--- Comment #2 from Steven Schveighoffer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #1) > As I determined in that thread, note that core.internal.hash.hashOf does not > do the same thing as object.hashOf. It hashes only the bits of the given > type. It being object.hashOf. core.internal.hash.hashOf does a more reasonable thing. --
