https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16521
--- Comment #8 from Steven Schveighoffer <[email protected]> --- guys, the static foreach comment was a *wish* for this, not a recommendation to use some already existing thing. It would be nice to do: static foreach(idx; 0 .. args.length) Instead of the goofy "unused" symbol thing. In my code, I'm using Args, not args, so I have no idea why a variable for each tuple item should even need to be created. It might even be a type! Note that the "deprecation" is what I'm concerned about, as I have only this one way to make my switch statement out of a tuple (sorry Stefan, but string mixin is a *vastly inferior* option compared to this mechanism), and some future version of dmd I worry is going to flag this as an error, even though I never use the variable I didn't want to declare but was forced to. --
