https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15459
--- Comment #8 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #7) > This is not a valid reduction because .front is never called. front is never called in the original code either. > The compiler > seems to be skipping semantic analysis of uncalled functions here to avoid > forward reference issues: https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/2851 So the invalid front is supposed to be accepted (if it's never called)? Then I suppose the accepts-invalid aspect of this issue is WONTFIX. But it should link then, no? --
