https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17440
--- Comment #3 from Marenz <[email protected]> --- >Is there any particular reason you need to use Nullify with a class type >instead of simply using the class type directly and use "null" to indicate the >unset state? There is no pressing need to do this. I am having a special array class that wraps every member in a Nullable and of course it's templated. So I needed to add a special overload/case for class types to work around that. It's less a 'need' but more a 'this was very unexpected'. --
