https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7970
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Vladimir Panteleev from comment #4) > Wouldn't "fixing" this today be a breaking language change? > > As far as I understand, such changes now need to go through the DIP process, > though if they're going to break code, that's unlikely to go anywhere. > > Does this issue have a snowball's chance in hell to be fixed? If not, then > it's pointless to keep it open. It's probably the only thing related to @property that _does_ have a chance of being fixed. It does require a DIP though. --
