https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3720

FeepingCreature <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #15 from FeepingCreature <[email protected]> ---
Here's a subset of this that should be fixed immediately:

class S {
  void fun() { }
  static void function() fun2() { return &fun; }
}

There is *no* good reason to allow this, because you can always do &S.fun
explicitly. This looks *way* too innocuous for the horror that it is.

--

Reply via email to