https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18604
--- Comment #3 from anonymous4 <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Seb from comment #0) > `in` currently just means `const` That antifeature was only sort of done for safe code, whatever you do, system code shouldn't be affected. Though given how much breakage safe code received lately, I see no reason to not enforce scope for `in` in dip1000 mode, I don't think it can add noticeably more breakage, but postponing it will aggravate the issue. --
