https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19197
--- Comment #1 from Tiberiu Lepadatu <tiberiulepadat...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to ZombineDev from comment #0) > Since core.internal.hash.hashOf is a template, there are a number potential > benefits: > * better performance (e.g. more opportunities for inlining, less > indirections for value types) > * less dependence on TypeInfo (which we want to phase out in the long term) > * -betterC friendly (no need to link druntime and phobos to your library / > app, in order to use simple templates like std.typecons.Nullable) I have started working on this but when I change typeid(T).getHash(..) to hashOf at line 2682 the unittest is failing. Is the return of the hashOf different that the one for the one for the typeid(T).getHash(..)? --
