https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=809
--- Comment #7 from Stewart Gordon <[email protected]> --- (In reply to RazvanN from comment #6) > I interpreted Walter's comment and replied as an extension to his first > comment. As I interpret Walter's comment, it's talking about Li's original idea, that one should be able to use the bare name of the lazy parameter to mean the delegate. Then I suggested defining &dg to mean the delegate. Really, the essence of this issue is that it's suggesting definining a syntax to extract the delegate from a lazy function parameter - which could be a language-defined overload of the & (address-of) operator per comment 2, or it could be something else entirely. --
