https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18016
--- Comment #16 from anonymous4 <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Steven Schveighoffer from comment #12) > I don't understand how the suggestion that the behavior is implementation > defined doesn't jive with LLVM's chosen behavior. Walter suggests that value should be implementation defined, not behavior. LLVM's optimization is inspired by gcc's understanding of undefined behavior, I suspect it won't provide safety. --
