On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:26 PM, BCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reply to Jarrett, > >> I just don't think it's possible. If all classes had default ctors, >> it'd be easy; is(typeof(new T)) would be false if and only if T were >> abstract. But since that's not the case, I can't think of a way to >> generically see if a given class type is abstract. Any ideas? >> >> It's always a little frustrating when doing type introspection and >> having to rely on weird side-effects and properties of types, when the >> compiler is just keeping it in some flag or field somewhere. Sigh. >> "is(T == abstract)"? :P >> > > _traits(isAbstractClass, Class) // 2.0 only IIRC
D1.
