Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Lars T. Kyllingstad" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
I think you have to use opEquals to overload ==. opCmp only applies to <,
<=, >, and >=.
Oh, I figured either opEquals would be defined in terms of opCmp or an
overloaded opCmp would imply a new opEquals defined in terms of it, or
something like that.
I think if opCmp is defined and opEquals is not, an opEquals should be
implicitly defined in terms of opCmp. I've actually thought about making
my own "Object" class... ANyone else have a personalized Object they use?
