Saaa wrote:
What kind of fall-throughs were these?
A:
case value1:
case value2:
case valueN:
code1();
break;
B:
case value1:
code1();
case value2:
code2();
break;
The solution is to forbid fallthrough, and change the switch syntax:
switch(value) {
case 1:
case 2:
// something
break;
}
gives: Error, missing break at the end of case1.
But:
switch(value) {
case 1, 2:
// something
break;
}
works as expected.
What's wrong with that?
Doesn't support B :)
How about a warning instead?
The idea is that it not supporting B is something good.
An error is ok, and if you want to translate C code then it's really
easy to change the code to not give errors.
