Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:18:24 +0000 (UTC), teo wrote: > On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 02:18:28 +0400, Sergey Gromov wrote: > >> My guess is that test.di is exactly the same as test.d because all the >> functions are small. Therefore compiling 'dmd prog.d test.di' resolves >> all symbols statically and the .so is simply not linked. Does your >> 'prog' have any unresolved symbols in its symbol table? > > It looks like this is the case. I found following in the symbols: > 0804b8cc T _D4test6testMeFZi > 0804b8d8 T _D4test9testClassFiZC4test4Test > > The whole nm output is too long, but if you want I can send it to you. > > When I use the *--undefined-only* option I get: > $ nm -u prog > [snip]
All unresolved symbols seem to be in glibc. I've filed a bug: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3226
