-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ary Borenszweig wrote: > div0 wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Jarrett Billingsley wrote: >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:36 PM, div0<d...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >>> >>> That's what he's suggesting, and it does make sense. When you write a >>> template, *either* it's meant to be used as a mixin, *or* it's meant >>> to be used some other way. Mixin in a template that wasn't meant to >>> be a mixin or vice versa usually makes no sense. >> >> Hmmm. >> >> Not convinced by that argument, I can think of good reasons to use a >> template as both. > > Can you provide an example?
Yeah, but it's Friday night, I'm drinking beer now. :o I'll do it tomorrow. Bills response is the start of it though. - -- My enormous talent is exceeded only by my outrageous laziness. http://www.ssTk.co.uk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFKjvdLT9LetA9XoXwRAh9QAJ9Sj/IY+xjEiJJ9QV3+fnJokyqVLQCfbARp 2IA3oDip/LxFDzhsx4cLDVw= =oNLO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
