Jeremie Pelletier wrote > > Then why use an ubyte instead of a byte or an int? I wasn't me who wrote that part of the code :)
> > You could also just do: > for(int i = cast(byte)nloop; i < 10; i++) I forgot the minus sign: for(int i = -cast(int)nloop;i< 10; i++) Still think it is unnecessary bug-prone.
