-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Nadlinger wrote: >> Although the code works fine with DMD, LDC complains that »this« is needed > to evaluate &foo in addressOf.
That looks like a ldc bug. &foo is occurring in a normal method so it does have 'this'. > Is this a bug in LDC or in fact illegal code > which DMD happens to erroneously accept? Are there any less hackish ways to > perform the check? Not with D1 I think. D2 has traits to help with this sort of thing. http://www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0/traits.html - -- My enormous talent is exceeded only by my outrageous laziness. http://www.ssTk.co.uk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFLCGLXT9LetA9XoXwRAu7LAJ9GXGar/C/wyjkdRmrYLp5ZHsK7gACeLznU T0RIByTstdeRHgsejvdv+B0= =TgeR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
