On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:23:43 -0500, Richard Webb <[email protected]> wrote:

I just tried to build the Juno library with DMD 2.037, and got a bunch or errors like:

juno\com\core.d(295): Error: function juno.com.core.GUID.opEquals type signature should be const bool(ref const(GUID)) not bool(GUID other)

Which can be replicated with:
////////////////////////////////
struct Foo
{
        bool opEquals(Foo f) const
        {
                return true;
        }
}

void Bar()
{
        Foo f;
}
////////////////////////////////

It built ok with DMD2 a few months ago. Is this an intentional change?

It's due to this change: http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/260

The issue being fixed was this:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3433

I think it should be a bug, because your opEquals does not violate const, since you are making a copy of a Foo, and Foo contains no references. Please file a bug and reference 3433 and changeset 260. I think it should be allowed to have a signature like this:

bool opEquals(T other) const

inside T as long as T can be implicitly cast from const to mutable.


Also, while looking at the problem i noticed that code like:

////////////////////////////////
struct Foo
{
        ~this()
        {
                
        }
}

void Bar()
{
        const Foo f;
}
////////////////////////////////

Produces the error:

Error: destructor Foo.~this () is not callable using argument types ()

which seems a bit wrong?


Yeah, that's weird. Probably something to do with const. Probably should file another bug :)

-Steve

Reply via email to