Re: Is there a reason for default-int?

[Simen kjaeraas]

On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 07:37:42 +0100, Don <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:

Simen kjaeraas wrote:

Apart from C legacy, is there a reason to assume anything we don't know what is, is an int? Shouldn't the compiler instead say 'unknown type' or something

else that makes sense?

There's now an Error type in the compiler. It's gradually filtering its way through the compiler.

Great!

--
Simen