Lars T. Kyllingstad wrote: > The D2 language, which has so far been the "experimental branch" of D > and as such has been a rapidly moving target, is in its final stages of > completion. The specification has more or less been frozen, and > currently work is being done on bringing the DMD compiler up to spec. > When this is done (this summer, I believe) work is supposed to start on > a 64-bit compiler.
My concern about this is more along the lines of: when will D2 versions of LDC and/or GDC be available? To an extent I'm not sure I understand why, with two great backends available, D2 development did not switch over entirely to one or the other of these -- though I understand the fact that the DMD backend is probably the one the Digital Mars developers are most comfortable with.