-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dan wrote: > Hi All, > So there's my questions > Why D2 changed in this way the operators overloading? > I saw the the compiler compiles both the functions, even considering this I > assume it's not safe to use the old D1 way, > right?
Because Walter got fed up with trying to come up with the bazillon different names you need for all the operators. Don't forget you need the array operators (eg a[] += 5, opArrayAddAssign?!) as well as the the slicing ops (eg a[0..5] += 5, opSliceArrayAddAssign?!) which means doubling/trebling the number of old style names. Just gets sucky. And who knows how many other operators might wind up being needed. I didn't like it at first glance either but I've changed my mind. - -- My enormous talent is exceeded only by my outrageous laziness. http://www.ssTk.co.uk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFL0r6GT9LetA9XoXwRAuWCAJ9i+oEf1Dgk1Tn1WJ7vcjvOM0+oPwCfZNgu m+ILQWOCPfvoRQseqcd9CyA= =mmsY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
