Simen kjaeraas wrote: > Ali Çehreli <acehr...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> Steven Schveighoffer wrote: >> >> > double [] foo = new double [cast(int)1e6]; >> > foo[] = 0; >> >> I've discovered that this is the equivalent of the last line above: >> >> foo = 0; >> >> I don't see it in the spec. Is that an old or an unintended feature?
I have to make a correction: It works with fixed-sized arrays. It does not work with the dynamic array initialization above.
> Looks unintended to me. In fact (though that might be the > C programmer in me doing the thinking), it looks to me like > foo = null;. It might be related to the discussion in > digitalmars.D "Is [] mandatory for array operations?". Thanks, Ali
