On Fri, 28 May 2010 22:42:32 -0400, Duke Normandin <dukeofp...@ml1.net>
wrote:
On Sat, 29 May 2010, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Duke Normandin <dukeofp...@ml1.net> wrote:
> So these two paragraphs in the tutorial are flat out wrong?
Absolutely.
Then I'm done with _that_ site - can't trust it!
Any chance that you could suggest a good beginner's D tutorial?
It's quite possible that the example code *worked* at some very early
version of the D compiler.
Nowadays, all arrays are initialized with null as the pointer,
guaranteeing that the first time you access array[0], it will segfault.
So with the current compilers, that code is *guaranteed* to not work.
I speak not from experience, ever since I've started using D it always
initializes arrays to null. I just can't imagine that someone would have
written such a tutorial without having some experience with D, and without
ever having compiled the code. So my logical conclusion is that either 1)
at some point, that code did work, 2) the author was so convinced of his D
mastery that he didn't bother to try any of his examples, or 3) the page
is a blatant attempt to make users not like D.
I find 2 unlikely since he specifically mentions how you don't have to
initialize arrays.
I wonder if someone recalls the feature set of the dmd compiler from July,
2005.
-Steve
