On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 22:00, Steven Schveighoffer <schvei...@yahoo.com>wrote:But char[1 + ...] is already a type, no? I thought typeof() was to extractcode i'm not sure what the is(char[1 + Range.empty]))Hm..., then shouldn't that be is(typeof(...))?type from an expression?
Yes, you are right, I'll just shut up now :) -Steve