Stanislav Blinov Wrote: > Stanislav Blinov wrote: > > > > > I'm not sure about Variant part yet (never tried it myself) > > Hmm, after some inspection I can say this is an implementation issue. > > You'll find that there are cases when what's told in TDPL doesn't work > (see recent msg[0] or msg.field[0]? in this group, for example). I' for > example, have just found that receive(OwnerTerminated) doesn't work as > well. It's just that current dmd and phobos implementations need time to > catch up TDPL (I know, things often go in reverse, but with D it's not > the case :) )
Yeah, sorry about that. This is fixed in SVN.
