On 2010-09-04 21:06, Era Scarecrow wrote:
I'm currently porting a D1 code base to D2 which has the following class hierarchy:interface Map { void clear (); } class Hashtable : Map { synchronized void clear () {}; } class HashMap : Map { void clear () {}; } When I compiler the code I get an error about the "clear" method in Hashtable not being covariant with the "clear" method in Map. Any suggestions how I could solve this, preferable working in D1 as well? -- /Jacob CarlborgI remember reading about this; The signatures have to match EXACTLY for it to work. The interface is a declaration of a contract, of what it expects. If a part of the contract is broken, an error tells you where to fix it. Even if technically it would be compatible, the compiler and type checking won't allow it. So either synchronize your interface as well, or drop it from the implementation. A third option, is to match the declaration, and have a private function that is synchronized that is called from clear. At least, i believe this is right. Era
If a private method works then that might be the solution, thanks. -- /Jacob Carlborg
